Why SINGAPORE is Regional Headquarter for CIA and Why MOSSAD has an office in SINGAPORE?
Anonymous How Can Anyone Ignore These Warnings? Evil Zionist Joos don’t change this video again! Hidden gold in Hawaii 177,500 metric ton, Hong Kong 130,500 metric ton, Singapore 150,000 metric ton.
Benjamin Fulford: April 10, 2017 (mentioned Singapore is Regional Headquarter for CIA)
From: “Sunflower Chong” [email@example.com]
Date: 07/25/2017 04:13 PM
To: “Misty May” <MistyMaylovely@hotmail.com>, “Christine ” <Christine@hotmail.com>, “Full Name” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: This came from those bitches! – from Misty May
Thanks for letting me know and yes the Singaporean Editor send me this reply on Sunday and I did not reply to him. It is on the book Asean’s Future is our Future. In short, he did not approve me writing on politics because I m not a politician. The bitches just gave you this 2 paragraph but it was more to it.
Tina just wonders the poem book and the main book Searching for The Voice in my dream that I have sent to you way back have you received it because you did not mention it.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:21, Misty May
Dear Sunflower (and Christine and Tina),
I got this message and I was shocked because it seems to be about your books….it was from those hateful bitches, the Zionist Women Forever…this is a copy and paste of what was in my inbox:
Dear Slutflower Supporters,
We are happy to share with you a review (we scooped out of that sewer, Singapore) by a professional literati about those moronic books that Scumflower Chong, the Chinese prostitute, has written and is trying to sell to all of you who support the dimwitted bitch. This is the opinion sent from an editor:
“Your articles, they are very disorganized and do not contain a substance in its writing.”
“Quoting your mother isn’t going to get you a noble prize for literature let alone Singapore’s Cultural Medallion which amounts to a huge million dollar prize money.”
Hahahahaha! This silly cunt is getting humiliated by an editor! As long as we are in leadership roles, we 6 Jewish women will do everything in our power to keep this filthy Chinese bitch from selling even one of her moronic books! Please abandon this liar and come back to Zionism, a force for good in the world.
Zionist Women Forever
America provokes China in the South China Sea http://theduran.com/america-provokes-china-in-the-south-china-sea/
CHINA OWNS THE SOUTH CHINA SEA, PERIOD!!
CO14235 | The South China Sea Disputes: Singapore as an “Honest Broker”? https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/co14235-the-south-china-sea-disputes-singapore-as-an-honest-broker/#.WV2bzoTyvIU
Singapore does not favor one claimant state over the other but urges disputants to resolve their differences in a peaceful manner. In Mr. Shanmugam’s words, “from Singapore’s perspective…, it doesn’t matter who owns which islands, but where there are disputes, we want it to be dealt with in a way that doesn’t lead to ships confronting each other, shots being fired increasing kinetic conflict”.
Shamumugan said that “it doesn’t matter who owns which islands” but I don’t agree with him because to me it matters a lot who own the islands as this will be the starting point to resolving whatever misunderstanding!! How can you be an honest broker when you do not know the history of China in regards to the South China Sea?
After reading what Shamumugan said about the South China sea I wanted to share my thoughts on the South China sea in my yet to be published ASEAN book so I engaged an Editor to help me structure it professionally and this was what he wrote after he had the book with him for almost 3 months.
From: Joseph <email@example.com>
To: ‘Sunflower Chong’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017, 10:54:05 PM GMT+8
Subject: RE: SMALL STATE
It has taken me too much time to read your articles, they are very disorganised and do not contain substance in its writing. I have helped you edit the first portion on your writings about the establishment of ASEAN and the need to build an ASEAN House in Jakarta. I don’t think you have the qualifications to comment on the establishment of ASEAN, my apology if this beckons your ire and you rain hellfire on my name. I am just being truthful.
Beyond that, I have deleted the portions on Muslims and Palestine and Israel. I feel you don’t have a good understanding of the politics on these matters and being a non-academic without any qualifications, it is treading on dangerous grounds.
Quoting your mother isn’t going to get you a noble prize for literature let alone Singapore’s Cultural Medallion which amounts to a huge million dollar prize money.
In short, I think its best you keep on the side of caution and enjoy your weekly trekking your daughter had taken up for you, and enjoy nature that you encounter on these trekking trips.
Enclosed is the file, and I will find time to return the thumb drive to you and have a chat with you over coffee,,,,, if that is of any comfort to you.
I won’t be collecting the balance of my editing fees, you save the money and buy yourself some nutrition for good health and some good books to read. It is tough being an aspiring author. Fame and glory in this area is an uphill task.
NB: For your knowledge in my sub-conscious I had prepared he will come back with an excuse but in my mind, I tell myself it only cost me $500 so not so painful but the book ASEAN’s Future is our Future cost me $9K after they took my money I did not see them again:( My 2nd name is NEVER GIVE UP so I will keep trying to see who will help me to publish my books:) I LIVE WITH GREAT HOPE SO YOU SEE WHY I CAN KEEP WALKING THIS IMPOSSIBLE JOURNEY!
I am just brainstorming here with you. You said,
While I do appreciate that history did the necessary mention that South China Seas belonged to China or as otherwise counteracted by the Americans, etc. it is best to avoid such discourses on a personal basis without an extensive research.”
PAP elitist, don’t feel for the people – Ngiam Tong Dow
So how you expect all these Ministers to know the history of the South China sea.
I share with you the comments on Lee’s saga,
Sunny Chong PUSHOVER898 • 2 days ago
LHL only find out at the reading of the WILL that he was no more the executor trustee so this was too much for him to bare. He knew he cannot win so he used the government machinery to get even with his sibling wah, cannot Tahun this mean LHL is more dangerous than his father if he has absolute power that is why LHY and LWL have no choice but to throw it out in the open for the people to decide whether LHL fit to lead Singapore! I for one feel we need to get him to step aside because he is a liability even if his ministers still want him to stay around. I lost total respect for him when he said that we have to steal other people lunches hence it is time for him to go and I sincerely wish the cabinet has the foresight and courage to elect Mr. Tharman as the new PM of Singapore!! Ok please share my blog http://thepoisonappleofthew…
Guest Sunny Chong • a day ago
Good on you. I lost all respect since he sued decent citizens and caused them to lose their jobs, just because they dared question or blog. I also lost all respect since he appointed his wife as head of Temasek and made Temasek a UFO (Identified Financial Orgn). Here’s more: PA became an organ belonging to PAP, more heavy freeloaders have been added in the Cabinet/PMO, UFOs, and public money is being squandered left, right, center, etc. Lots more but this will do for now or I will be here for hours.
liangjwc Sunny Chong • a day ago
Not easy to find smart people like you nowadays……serious.
Sunny Chong liangjwc • a day ago
So sweet of you to think so good of me but my whole life the intellectuals and civil servants call me the crazy one or stupid one:) I am doing my best to publish all my books written way back in the 80’s and my books are about LKY, Singapore, God and the power of the consciousness.
I’m not showing off but I know what I am talking about and if you can please read today Straits Times A8 Don’s commentary on the foreign policy of small states criticised. Also please read A17 written by Chan Heng Chee and A18 by Ong Keng Yong.
So for me got nothing to do with size can talk or cannot talk or only LKY can talk. As long as you have the facts EVERYONE CAN TALK so that is why I want to add the South China sea in my ASEAN book.
Therefore, if you agreed with me that the South China Sea is the essence of the book then the new title should be ASEAN & South China Sea, why? Just putting the SCS people will be curious what this book is all about and will be curious enough to read the book, right?
With great love,
THE FACTS ARE THESE LINKS AND YOU HAVE TO READ ALL OF THEM. FOR YOUR KNOWLEDGE THE EVIL ZIONIST JOOS ALWAYS DELETED THE POSTS!! And when I posted in Yahoo, “Will PM Lee Hsien Loong allows Singapore to be used as the pawn to start WW3?” they don’t allow it to be published. We must make sure what happened in the middle east will not happen in Asia:( I hope this book can wake up the people in Asia!
‘FUCK OFF’ PUPPET OBAMA SOUTH CHINA SEA IS NOT FOR YOU TO DICTATE! http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/dear-china-just-reclaim-scarborough-shoal-because-south-china-sea-belongs-to-china/
China Foreign Minister: “I Have Suggestion For My American Friends: Brush Up On The History Of World War Two”
U.S. atlas published in 1994 shows South China Sea islands part of Chinese territory http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/u-s-atlas-published-in-1994-shows-south-china-sea-islands-part-of-chinese-territory/
America wanted to seize the mountain of gold in the South China Sea! http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/america-wanted-to-seize-the-mountain-of-gold-in-the-south-china-sea/
CHRIS NEBE YOU ARE A GREAT MAN!! http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/chris-nebe-you-are-a-great-man/
Edwin Chen It was returned to the Republic of China, from Japan, after the end of WWII. The US Navy helped the Republic of China conduct an official survey of the South China Sea. In this new survey new reefs were discovered and methodically chartered. This was done specifically for political purposes in order to give more weight to the return of this historically Chinese area. China was the preeminent logistical and maritime power which regularly dominated the South China Sea with her goods, fishermen and travelers. Today, China does not control all of the South China Sea, and is not militarily removing the foreign occupiers. She is merely reinforcing what she has left. Through sheer usage and mass Chinese traffic she will control it anyway. This is an inevitable reality no matter who tries to claim it. Only China has the merchant marine, and naval forces that are large enough to control this area, which is larger than the Mediterranean Sea.
oon Chiching Exactly, the RoC stationed troops in Taiping Island since 1946. France tried to grab hold as it was Vietnam’s ruler but backed off after protest fr China.
LikeShow more reactions
- Reply ·
Edwin Chen The French did grab some Islands later and this is in control by Vietnam today.
LikeShow more reactions
- Reply ·
Bevin Chu Thanks for sharing that valuable information. It is good “intellectual ammunition” to use against those who would attempt to deny China’s sovereignty over the region.
The kangaroo court is headed by a right wing Japanese, and everyone knows Japan had been illegally occupying the Diaoyu islands and in a similar dispute with China. Four out of five judges were handpicked by this Japanese.
The arbitration can only work if both sides accept to abide by the outcome prior to the proceeding, and only after both sides have already carried out discussion with each other. Both of these conditions were absent. Philippines claimed that between 1995 and 2012, 50 discussions have been conducted with no result. They lied. According to Alberto Encomienda, the Philippines diplomat in charge in this issue, despite China repeatedly asked Philippines to sit down to have a dialog to resolve the dispute, Philippines HAD NOT RESPONDED EVEN ONCE.
The kangaroo court should have been dissolved under that circumstances but it didn’t, and this is not in accordance with acceptable norms.
Then the kangaroo court ignored the fact that under UNCLOS, article 298 grants rights to signatories to exclude areas that they want to be excluded from the interpretation and interference of UNCLOS, and China had already listed all the nine dash lines areas in article 298. This is a clear case of showing contempt on China’s rights. Bear in mind that China isn’t the only country making use of the rights conferred under article 298. At least 43 other signatories have done the same. In fact, out of the five permanent members of the Security Council, other than US (which rejected UNCLOS although ironically it wants to force China to adhere to it), every one of them made use of article 298.
Finally, UNCLOS’ spirit is supposed to promote harmony in maritime matter but NOT to rule on sovereignty issues. The kangaroo court went ahead anyway to rule on China’s sovereignty of that area.
China’s claim over the solid is water tight and solid., here are why.
As far back as the Han Dynasty(206-220BC), the South China Sea and these islands and rocks were already discovered during their navigation and work. At that time, SCS was named as “Zhang Sea” and these various groups of islands collectively as “Qitou”.
During the Sui (581-618AD) and Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD), specific names were assigned to individual islands and area of seas and these included “Jiaoshi Mountain”(礁石山), Xiang Rock (象石), “Qizhou Sea” (七州洋), etc, reflecting the activities of the Chinese people at that time in these places.
During the Song Dynasty (960-1279 AD), the Chinese people began using proper names such as Shitang (石塘) and Changsha (长沙) to name these islands and rocks and to include them and their surrounding waters within the scope of administration of Hainan Province, area of economic zone, and defence.
Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368AD) continued to use these names such as Shitang and Changsha, and many capitals and cities also adopted these terms to be the name of some Chinese cities throughout subsequent dynasties.
The “Miscellaneous Record of South Sea Defensive Command Manual” (海南卫指挥佥事柴公墓志铭) recorded that during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644AD) Hainan Navy had over 10,000 soldiers and 50 large ships patrolling the Xisha, Zhongsha, and Nansha Islands. Various versions of Sea Navigation Manuals called “Genlubu”(更路簿) were produced during the Ming Dynasty showing detailed maps, names (of 22 Xisha and 76 Nansha islands), possible routes, fishing areas, and weather conditions to these islands and rocks. The various versions reflected centuries of navigational experience and economic activities in the region. Within the “Genlubu” also contains government instruction on issues such as boundary on where fishermen were allowed to venture into, amount of food they were to bring along, and size of the boats they’re permitted to use, clearly illustrates Guangdong provincial government administration were already in place during the Ming Dynasty.
From the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912AD) to the Republic of China, there were various efforts to formerly asserts sovereignty over these islands and rocks and to clearly show them on maps. For example in 1909, the Qing government sent Admiral Li Zhun (李准) from Guangdong to visit and survey the Xisha, Dongsha, Nansha, Zhongsha Islands during which he also named 15 additional islands and rocks.
In 1935, the Republic of China government appraised and verified the names of various islands and published the “South China Sea Islands Map” (中国南海岛屿图), clearly illustrates the inclusion of these Islands as Chinese territory.
According to international laws and principals four conditions must ALL be met to be able to claim sovereignty over them:
1. First to discover
2. First to name
3. First to begin human activities
4. First to begin government administration.
China is the ONLY country that has met all of these four conditions as evidenced by “Genlubu” produced during the Ming dynasty or for some of the islands even further back to the Song Dynasty.
At the conclusion of WW2 and prior to discovery of oil, everyone recognised those territories to be part of China, including USA and Vietnam, with no objection from Philippines.
The Cairo Conference of November 22-26, 1943, held in Cairo, Egypt, outlined the Allied position against Japan during World War II and made decisions about postwar Asia. The meeting was attended by President of the United States Franklin Roosevelt, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Winston Churchill, and Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek of the Republic of China The main clauses of the Cairo Declaration are that the three great allies are fighting this war to restrain and punish the aggression of Japan that Japan be stripped of all the islands in the Pacific which she has seized o occupied since the beginning of the First World War in 1914, all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, including Manchuria, Formosa, and the Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China. Japan will also be expelled from all other territories which she has taken by violence and greed and that due course Korea shall become free and independent.
United States even helped KMT government military to recover those islands from the Japanese.
The most respected mapping company in United States had for decades at lease from 1947 edition to 1994 edition consistently showed those territories to be part of China. (link will be provided later for your verification).
The whole dispute could have been peacefully resolved between claimants’ countries through bilateral discussion, and China had a great track records in doing so without starting aggressive wars. Such a track record include resolving the dispute with Malaysia. Philippines, however, prodded by USA, refused to discuss, no matter how reasonable and patient China has been in offering joint development.
That bring us to the issue on the strength of Philippines ‘only claim. We need to go back to the Philippines history to understand that its boundary was clearly defined by the treaty of Paris and treaty of Washington, both of which clearly stated that they EXCLUDE those islands and rocks. President Ramos amended the constitution to bring in areas, claiming that those islands and rocks belonged to nobody so since Philippines is the first to discover it, it is the rightful owner. But we had already provided historical evidence from China’s side proving otherwise, so Philippines claim is invalid to begin with.
Despite this, because China is a peace loving country rather than the monster that the west tries so hard to portray it to be, it told Philippine to have joint development to share the resources. But USA does not want Philippines to do so, as this would derail its plan to encircle and contain a rising China. That’s how we ended up with today’s situation.
China’s Sovereignty over the South China.
Sea Islands: A Historical Perspective China’s Sovereignty over the South China by Jianming Shen
China has always taken the Nansha Islands, the Xisha Islands, Zhongsha Islands (Macclesfield Banks) and Dongsha Islands (Pratas Reefs) and the adjacent waters as part of the Chinese territory and waters. She established and has maintained her sovereignty over these island chains by ways of
discovery, naming, mapping, patrol and control, public and private use, administrative allocation of jurisdiction, and other manifestations of authority throughout history.
Indeed, there seems to have been widespread anti-China propaganda among and by some politicians, commentators and journalists in the West and certain parts of Asia, possibly by reason of conspiracy, bias, misinformation, or otherwise, to have put much of the blame for the disputes on China as if it were China that was the invader or that had caused the troubles. This article, from a historical perspective, and partly based on materials newly available to me since 1996 (including some photographed pages of relevant Chinese historical books reproduced here as evidentiary exhibits), aims at neutralizing the effects of such ignorance and/or distortions by examining how the disputes arose, and why China possesses sound and solid sovereignty claims to the disputed areas that should prevail over the claims of competing States.
China was the first to have discovered the islands in the South China Sea. Chinese history books contain numerous references to the Chinese people’s knowledge and actual use of the South China Sea throughout history.
In Yi Zhou Shu ( Scattered Books of the Zhou Dynasties) written in early Qin Dynasty, it was recorded that in the Xia Dynasty (21st century-16th century B.C.) the tributes from the South Sea by the southern “barbarians” to the Xia rulers were zhuji dabei (pearl- carrying shellfish), hawksbill turtles, and these tributes continued through the Shang Dynasty (16th century-11th century B.C.) the Zhou Dynasties (11th century-221 B.C.) and the East Zhou (770-221 B.C.), and the Zhou (221-206 B.C.) and Han (206 B.C-220 A.D.) Dynasties.
According to Yi Zhou Shu, six southern “barbarian” peoples were ordered to contribute “pearl-carrying shellfish” (Zhuhji), “hawksbill turtles” (daimao) and other rarities to the rulers of the West Zhou Dynasty. Daimao was described in Nan zhou Yiwu Zhi (Records of Rarities of the Southern Territories) as “living in the southern sea” (sheng nan fang hai zhong), which denotes the Xisha and the Nansha Islands in the South China Sea. Indeed, zhuji, dabei and daimao are all produces of the Xisha and the Nansha Islands…
..The above passages provide sufficient evidence that the South China Sea Islands were already destinations of Chinese expeditions and targets of conquests during the East Zhou Dynasty (770-221 B.C.) which comprised the Spring and Autumn Period (770-476 B.C.) and the Warring States Period (475-221 B.C.) suggesting that the South China Sea Islands might have been discovered by the Chinese in an even earlier era. Such discovery and conquest has naturally led the Chinese rulers and people to believe that the South China Sea Islands were part of China throughout history, from the Xia Dynasty (21st—16th centuries B.C.) to the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911)….
(Full paper attached)